Main | Of possible interest »

Left onely in those written Records pure

Thir doctrine and thir story written left,
They die; but in thir room, as they forewarne,
Wolves shall succeed for teachers, grievous Wolves,
Who all the sacred mysteries of Heav’n
To thir own vile advantages shall turne [ 510 ]
Of lucre and ambition, and the truth
With superstitions and traditions taint,
Left onely in those written Records pure,
Though not but by the Spirit understood.
Then shall they seek to avail themselves of names, [ 515 ]
Places and titles, and with these to joine
Secular power, though feigning still to act
By spiritual, to themselves appropriating
The Spirit of God, promisd alike and giv’n
To all Beleevers; and from that pretense, [ 520 ]
Spiritual Lawes by carnal power shall force
On every conscience; Laws which none shall finde
Left them inrould, or what the Spirit within
Shall on the heart engrave. What will they then
But force the Spirit of Grace it self, and binde [ 525 ]
His consort Libertie; what, but unbuild
His living Temples, built by Faith to stand,
Thir own Faith not anothers: for on Earth
Who against Faith and Conscience can be heard
Infallible? yet many will presume: [ 530 ]
Whence heavie persecution shall arise
On all who in the worship persevere
Of Spirit and Truth; the rest, farr greater part,
Well deem in outward Rites and specious formes
Religion satisfi’d; Truth shall retire [ 535 ]
Bestuck with slandrous darts, and works of Faith
Rarely be found: so shall the World goe on,
To good malignant, to bad men benigne,
Under her own waight groaning

John Milton, Paradise Lost, Book XII

Posted on April 12, 2009 at 02:44PM by Registered Commenterhb | Comments11 Comments

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (11)

stewart is retiring
April 29, 2009 at 05:19PM | Unregistered Commenterjohnson
Another wicked rumor to raise our false hopes?!?
May 2, 2009 at 08:49AM | Unregistered CommenterUghhhho
Be still, my beating heart! Not that I loved Stewart less, but that I loved Hamilton more. Alas, too good to be true.
May 12, 2009 at 04:26PM | Unregistered CommenterKi Webster
(Dear Deadbeat Alumn),

I, my colleagues, and our predecessors in Hamilton’s Economics Department, such as the esteemed and sorely missed Sidney Wertimer, coaxed, cajoled, and counseled you to success. We did this not out of duty, but because we believed in your potential, in the certainty that you would, in due course, positively impact the world through your work and lives. We gladly leant our time and expertise to you, and would do so again without reservation or condition. We are proud of you and of our shared department, which continues to host the largest numbers of majors and course offerings at the college, with professors recognized by their national peers to be of the highest caliber. I must point out, however, that none of this would be or have been possible without the generosity of previous generations of Hamilton alumni.

That said, I was surprised and distraught to learn that many Economics alumni have not yet given to this year’s Annual Fund. Given the depth of the global economic downturn and its pervasive impact, Hamilton included, I feel it is necessary to coax and cajole you once again – please support your alma mater. Current students should have, at minimum, the same opportunities that you had. One financial aid dollar of every four comes from unrestricted Annual Fund gifts. You can (at risk of being forward might I say should) play a significant role in perpetuating the tradition of educational excellence on the Hill. There is an expression, perhaps now overused but nevertheless still instructive – Pay It Forward. Please.

I look forward to hearing that Hamilton’s Economics alumni recognize how important their support is to the future of our College, including the Economics Department itself.

I sincerely appreciate your consideration of this request. Thank you.

With best regards,

Erol Balkan
Professor of Economics
May 27, 2009 at 02:29PM | Unregistered CommenterSlidell
Dear Prof.Erol,

Thanks for your comments.

Scarcity is a good concept to revisit even in the context of academia. It was rumored that the College paid Jonathan Stewart a sum significantly greater than $100,000 for his recent show at Hamilton. Is that correct?

Can you confirm the specific number?

If so, it may not square the concept of highest & best use for some alumni, even economics majors. They may view it as an example of an unconstrained marginal propensity to consume...you know, entertainment qua luxury good.

As to educational excellence, did not Hamilton recently terminate merit scholarships so the resources could be otherwise diverted? Perhaps for Jon?
May 27, 2009 at 03:08PM | Unregistered Commenterhb
From HOLAC:
"The Sacerdote Great Names Series brings to campus national and international leaders in government, business, science and the arts. Established in 1996, the series provides Hamilton students, professors and staff members, as well as the broader community, with opportunities to interact with some of the world's most renowned individuals through free, public lectures and, in many cases, intimate classroom discussions. The series is made possible by a significant gift from Peter and Bonnie Sacerdote and their son Alex Sacerdote '94, and is named in their honor."

Clearly, the Sacerdote gift was a restricted (i.e., earmarked) gift - and one could therefore conclude that annual fund gifts, as well as monies designated for scholarships of any sort, were not used to fund the Jon Stewart performance.
May 27, 2009 at 09:30PM | Unregistered CommenterPW Dana
Wasn't Jon Stewart the source of the pinata image that sparked all the protests on the Hill this spring?

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=113671&title=Headlines---Borders
May 29, 2009 at 05:31PM | Unregistered CommenterChickens coming home to roost
Paquette has written an op-ed on the Delta Phi incident.
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2009/05/war_over_a_trojan_horse.html
May 29, 2009 at 07:26PM | Unregistered CommenterJust graduated
Off-topic, but $10.7 million to renovate/expand ELS seems like an extraordinary amount of money to me. Wow! Does the College really need to spend this much for yet another place for students to congregate and socialize (plus other stuff, I know), while having to charge $50k/year to attend the school? I would love to see a breakdown of the costs.
June 18, 2009 at 01:23PM | Unregistered CommenterSteven
Visited Hamilton during Alumni weekend.

College says 10.7 million is bargain in current economy.

Original estimate was closer to 20 million.

Much talk about student diversity. No mention of intellectual diversity.
June 18, 2009 at 08:29PM | Unregistered CommenterOne alum
I have been told by an eminent academic critic that I am a sad symptom of the failure of an intellectual class in time of crisis. The implication being, I suppose, that the professor and his colleagues are hilarious symptoms of success. The benefactors of humanity deserve due honor and commemoration. Let us build a Pantheon for professors. It should be located among the ruins of one of the gutted cities of Europe or Japan, and over the entrance to the ossuary I would inscribe, in letters six or seven feet high, the simple words: Sacred to the memory of the world's educators. SI MONUMENTUM REQUIRIS, CIRCUMSPICE.
A Huxley
September 19, 2009 at 10:45PM | Unregistered Commenterwtf

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.