« Interested Observer comments on AHC | Main | The failure of the Alexander Hamilton Center »

American Council of Trustees and Alumni on AHC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Contact: Anne D. Neal or Charles Mitchell

HAMILTON COLLEGE CANS WESTERN CIV CENTER

Students Lose, ACTA Says

CLINTON, NY (November 30, 2006)—Officials at Hamilton College have nixed a new center that was to study Western civilization and honor the school’s namesake, Alexander Hamilton. The administration had already announced the center—and a multi-million-dollar pledge to fund it—but reversed itself under faculty pressure. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni, which has been working with concerned Hamilton alumni, deplored the decision.

“The students have lost at Hamilton,” said ACTA president Anne D. Neal. “They would have benefited from the diverse ideas the Alexander Hamilton Center would have made available. But now they will not have the chance.”

According to its charter, the Center was to be devoted to the “study of freedom, democracy and capitalism…within the larger tradition of Western culture.” It would have been a part of a growing group of such centers nationwide, including the renowned James Madison Program at Princeton.

Hamilton announced the creation of the Alexander Hamilton Center on September 6. It then announced a $3.6 million pledge from a life trustee on October 13. But in the process, the Hamilton faculty voted overwhelmingly to condemn the Center’s charter.

The resolution that passed mentioned the Center’s governance, but the student newspaper noted that many objections came because some thought the political views of the Center’s founders were “offensive.” One faculty member told the media that “there are people on the faculty who think this center has an explicit, right tendency” and that “it suggests that the left got slapped down and so the right is being encouraged.”

Amid the controversy, a dean sent an e-mail on Nov. 27 saying that “now is not the time to proceed with the establishment of the center on campus.” An announcement was also posted on the Hamilton website saying: “Hamilton College has announced that the Alexander Hamilton Center will not be established at this time due to a lack of consensus about institutional oversight of the Center as a Hamilton program.”

This action comes in the wake of other recent moves by the college that have caused concern among many alumni. Last year, Hamilton’s Kirkland Project extended a speaking invitation to Ward Churchill (who has compared the victims of 9/11 to Nazis), and announced its intent to hire convicted felon Susan Rosenberg. After public outcry, neither decision was implemented.

The Kirkland Project was subsequently renamed the Diversity and Social Justice Project, whose mission includes fostering “intellectual activity necessary for social justice movements.” Also, in 2002, Hamilton’s then-president, Eugene Tobin, resigned under a cloud of plagiarism.

In the face of mounting concerns about Hamilton’s adherence to high academic standards and accountability, concerned alumni have run for Hamilton’s board of trustees, drawing nationwide headlines in the process.

“It’s clear that Hamilton administrators and trustees would rather kowtow to faculty politics than put the educational needs of students first,” Neal said. “The College has no trouble supporting a center whose stated purpose is political in nature. And yet it can’t find a way to permit a center studying Western civilization and honoring the college’s namesake. Alumni should rise up and demand answers!”

Hamilton’s board of trustees is scheduled to meet in New York City tomorrow.

The American Council of Trustees and Alumni is a bipartisan, national nonprofit dedicated to academic freedom, academic quality, and accountability in higher education. ACTA has a network of trustees and alumni across the country and has issued numerous reports including How Many Ward Churchills?, Intellectual Diversity: Time for Action, The Hollow Core, and Losing America’s Memory: Historical Illiteracy in the 21st Century. For further information, contact ACTA at (202) 467-6787.

###

http://www.goacta.org/press/Press%20Releases/11-30-06PR.htm

________________________________________________________________________________________________

See also Utica Observer Dispatch

Stephen H. Balch

Posted on November 30, 2006 at 10:18PM by Registered Commenterhb | Comments4 Comments

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

I'm a strong supporter of the AHC, and am sorry to see it fold. But I don't think it serves us well to throw around accusations without real basis in fact. A few important points:

(1) This was not, as some have said, the revenge of the aging tenured radicals. The prime tenured radical at Hamilton--Maurice Isserman, who proudly parades his FBI file--in fact supported the AHC loudly. Both Bob Paquette and Douglas Ambrose got their training with the well-known Marxist professor Eugene Genovese. There is no easy left/right split here.

(2) The change in direction did not come as a result of the faculty complaints. It came from the Board--people from prestigious NY law firms and financial institutions, people who have nothing in common with the "left."

What really happened was the Professors Paquette and Ambrose produced a flawed document, President Stewart failed in her duty to point out the flaws--and the Board was left to pick up the pieces.
December 1, 2006 at 04:26PM | Unregistered CommenterUnhappy alum
Was the document flawed? Or was it that both parties could not agree on the degree of faculty influence in the project? Too many commentators act as if the mission of a program is unrelated to the structures of governance. The faculty want influence over the project; the founders apparently fear the influence of the majority of the faculty. I don't call that a flaw; I call that a fundamental disagreement. Perhaps the trustees wanted to micromanage the project; perhaps they attempted to impose a version of the charter that demanded an unwanted faculty influence on programming? From what I can tell, this center did not have the autonomy of the Hoover Institute. Yet that case is instructive. Hoover has remained true to its mission because it is removed from faculty influence. In this curious case, we have far too many questions and too few answers. Can unhappy alum enlighten us on particulars of the trustees' objections?
December 1, 2006 at 05:58PM | Unregistered CommenterInterested Observer
While we’re trying to get to the heart of the matter here, could we please drop the moaning about “Western Civilization”? Whatever the merits of the AHC, it was not by any stretch of the imagination devoted to the “monuments” of Western Civilization. Most well-educated Westerners outside the AHC and ACTA have a good intuitive understanding of what those monuments are; despite the culture wars, there’s been continuing agreement about the enduring cultural stature of Plato, Homer, Virgil, Shakespeare, Rembrandt, Mozart, Tolstoy, Darwin, Freud…you know the list. Hamilton has long educated students about these monuments, and continues to do so: just look at the catalog. In fact, the AHC was not focusing on Western Civilization but on American history—something far more provincial in its sweep. The AHC made no effort to enlist colleagues who teach and do significant scholarship on the monumental figures of Western culture. In fact, the AHC (two American historians and an expert in financial markets) made every effort to make sure that those who do study Western Civilization more broadly were kept firmly at a distance. That's why there's no representation from the Classics Department or the Art History Department or the Philosophy Department.

Why wasn’t the center more honestly named the Alexander Hamilton Center for the Study of American History and Economics?
December 1, 2006 at 08:12PM | Unregistered CommenterDiogenes
Diogenes: Whatever the merits of the AHC, it also "stretches the imagination" that it could be "devoted" to anything if it never got off the ground.
December 1, 2006 at 10:20PM | Unregistered CommenterChrysippus

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.